35mm - anyone still use em? - ClubTread Community

User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of (permalink) Old 10-08-2012, 10:37 AM Thread Starter
Headed for the Mountains
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Invermere, BC, Canada.
Posts: 179
Default 35mm - anyone still use em?

Hi,
I always seem to be behind the curve as I still dont own a Wii or flat screen tv and in that theme I bought an expensive Canon 35mm camera a number of years ago. Digitals were out but just point and shoot models. Now there are digitals with interchangeable lenses etc that are the same price as the film one I bought.

I'm curious if anyone still uses film and if there is a market for my used but in amazing shape Canon Rebel.
Kootenay Kid is offline  
Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of (permalink) Old 10-08-2012, 11:56 AM
Summit Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,120
Default

L.O.L. I remember my first point & shoot was $800 for a Canon 5MP. Sice that time I have moved up to a DSLR and never looked back. When you figure in the cost of film & developing it will more than pay for itself if you take a lot of pictures. Sadly the only ones that want the old school stuff are maybe kids learning about photography at schools. Now a days with smart phones and cheap point & shoots no one wants them.
Just look at what happened to Kodak. Kodak's workforce peaked in 1988 at nearly 150,000 employees. But the company couldn't keep up with the shift from digital photo technology over the past decade and with competition from Japanese companies such as Canon.

My pride & joy now sits up in the closet and every now and then I'm tempted to take it out for a shoot. But then I think meh !!
19351 is offline  
post #3 of (permalink) Old 10-08-2012, 12:38 PM
High on the Mountain Top
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, bc, Canada.
Interest: Cycling, kayaking, photography, running, guitar,
Posts: 1,166
Default

2ΒΌ was my fave format but I traded my Hassleblad system for a Hi-8 system thinking that "still" was dead in the water. For portability I used early Leica, Canon and Nikon rangefinders. I still have a couple of Nikkormat FTN's lying in a catacomb of black cases. I'd consider shooting black and white again if I had the time - I used to mix my own developing chemistry from scratch.
Gearhed is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of (permalink) Old 10-08-2012, 02:48 PM
Summit Master
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Finally stopping that crazy suffering that is ice, climbing to concentrate on great ski tours!, .
Interest: Anything that can drag me to the mountains. Backpacking is #1, followed by climbing, dayhiking and camping with family.
Posts: 3,783
Default

Wanted to resist going digital as I loved my Kodachrome transparencies, but sadly, it's been discontinued even if I wanted to keep using it.

When I was a teen, we had our own fully equipped darkroom in the house and except for slide film, did all our own processing and printing. I loved it.
johngenx is offline  
post #5 of (permalink) Old 10-08-2012, 03:34 PM
High on the Mountain Top
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fraser Valley
Interest: Photography, Nature Observation, Health & Fitness, Nutrition, Shinrin-yoku
Posts: 1,661
Default

I use my Pentax KX 35mm film camera (circa 1975-1977) for black and white film. I believe B&W film has better texture and tonal range than digital B&W.
solo75 is offline  
post #6 of (permalink) Old 10-08-2012, 04:13 PM
Summit Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chilliwack + Osoyoos
Posts: 3,659
Default

My Buddy Geo (HSF on Flickr), has just moved BACK to 35mm and full frame (4x5) film cameras...

Check out his work... http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/geo-romolo.html and https://www.facebook.com/HSFPhotography
OK Jack is offline  
post #7 of (permalink) Old 10-08-2012, 09:28 PM
Hittin' the Trails
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: , , .
Posts: 45
Default

Unless it was a pretty high-end camera body like the eos 1v, I think the market for the camera body is probably pretty slim. Likely less than any sentimental attachment you might have for it. The reason being, DSLR's are so cheap now, and offer so much to the user, that you need to really want film for something specific to shoot it. And those users that do have their pick of the litter from older equipment. Lenses could be a different situation, depending on their quality and if they can be used in modern digital bodies -- the bigger the market, the more you can probably get for them.
monNom is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1