Public Input on Forest Stewardship Plans - ClubTread Community

User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of (permalink) Old 02-22-2006, 12:57 PM Thread Starter
Dru
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Climbing, a mountain, Canada.
Interest: climbing and spraying
Posts: 16,175
Default Public Input on Forest Stewardship Plans

From a release by the Forest Practices Board:

"Board Bulletin, Volume 7 – Forest Stewardship Plan Review: A Public Responsibility



This bulletin is the seventh in a series of Forest Practices Board bulletins describing new aspects of forest legislation, practices and trends, and their implications for forest stewardship. These bulletins are intended to foster discussion and to improve understanding of forest practices.



This bulletin is about the new approach to public consultation under the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA). Everyone - forest companies, the public and government - has a role in ensuring that public review and comment is effective. However, government has placed increased responsibility on the public for making the process work. The Board has produced this bulletin to help the public to understand how to have effective input to forestry plans under the FRPA process.



FRPA took effect in 2004, but most forest companies are continuing to operate with forest development plans approved under the previous Forest Practices Code. That will end in the next year or so as those companies switch to forest stewardship plans approved under FRPA. The new consultation process will come into effect as these plans are prepared in the coming months.



Forest stewardship plans must be available for public review and government approval. This helps British Columbians stay informed about forest practices in their areas of interest. Normally, the public has 60 days to review and provide written comments about a proposed forest stewardship plan. The forest company must consider the comments, and may choose to change its plan based on the input it receives. When it seeks approval of its forest stewardship plan from government, the company must also submit a copy of each written comment, and describe for government any changes made to the plan in response to the comments received.



Unlike forest development plans, forest stewardship plans do not have to include a map of proposed cutblocks and roads. A forest stewardship plan can simply identify one large area in which logging may occur over the next five years. Forest practice strategies or results must be in the plan, but they can be complicated and difficult for the general public to understand. Forest stewardship plans without details or measurable results provide no definite information about what forest practices will occur where and when. In other words, instead of responding to specific logging proposals in a forest stewardship plan, the public will have to identify all of its concerns for the entire area of potential development, which can be quite large - over 300,000 hectares in many of the plans submitted so far.



Under FRPA, forest companies show the approximate location of cutblocks and roads in a document called a site plan. Site plans must identify how the intended results or strategies described in the forest stewardship plan apply to the site. A site plan usually indicates a company's follow-through on any commitments arising from public comment about its forest stewardship plan, as well as its plans to protect public values where no such comments or commitments were made.



Although a site plan must be available for public review on request, there is no requirement to inform the public that a site plan is available. FRPA provides no formal review and comment procedure for site plans, nor any requirement to resolve public concerns about a site plan. Site plans do not require government approval under FRPA; forest companies simply advise government that harvesting is about to begin. Whether public concerns about specific forest activities are resolved is now a matter of negotiation between the public and the forest companies.



That means more work for the public in dealing directly with forest companies, with no recourse to government. Under FRPA, it is up to individual British Columbians to ensure that their concerns, as expressed in the forest stewardship plan review and comment procedure, are eventually and adequately accommodated on-the-ground.



To achieve this goal, the Board recommends that members of the public review forest stewardship plans and make comments about any issues or concerns they may have. Carefully prepared comments will help forest companies develop strategies or results that show exactly how the concerns will be addressed at the site level, if the company decides to do so. Public comments on FSPs should also include a formal request that the company provide an opportunity to comment on site plans in their area of interest; before those plans are signed by a forest professional. Otherwise, the public will have to contact the forest company on a virtually daily basis to check whether such plans are in development.



Effective public review and comment is important under FRPA. Forest stewardship plans have a five-year term but can be extended to ten years by government. Therefore, the FSP is the public's only opportunity to provide formal comment on forest practices in a potentially large area for five to ten years. It is too early to tell whether the public will be content with these reduced consultation provisions.



Effective consultation is dependent on the efforts and relationships of the individuals involved.

Members of the public must now make their own efforts to stay informed, must focus their comments on substantial matters of influence to forest planning, and must follow-up with forest companies at the site plan stage to ensure that provided input has been satisfactorily addressed. For effective public consultation under FRPA to succeed, British Columbians must make their interests and concerns known, and forest companies and professionals need to demonstrate a responsive approach to those public interests and concerns."

I bolded what I think are the most important points.
Dru is offline  
Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of (permalink) Old 02-22-2006, 01:38 PM
Summit Master
 
mick range's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Forest Gnome Cabin, , Canada.
Interest: Outdoor stuff...especially scrambling,trailrunning,mountain biking,kayaking,and hiking, and of course photography
Posts: 13,876
Default

Good post, Dru [^]
mick range is offline  
post #3 of (permalink) Old 02-22-2006, 03:18 PM
High on the Mountain Top
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Interest: Mountaineering, Backcountry Skiing, Hiking, Rock Climbing, Photography
Posts: 1,521
Default

So where do we find these plans if we want to look at them and make comments?
scottN is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of (permalink) Old 02-22-2006, 03:27 PM Thread Starter
Dru
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Climbing, a mountain, Canada.
Interest: climbing and spraying
Posts: 16,175
Default

You request them from the forest companies or view them at the local MoF office.
Dru is offline  
post #5 of (permalink) Old 02-22-2006, 05:37 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 28
Default

Looks a lot like an abrogation of government duty to steward public resources which can only be solved by voters. Looks like the motivation for this change was to save paperwork by forest companies and continue unsustainable practices with even less oversight than a politically hamstrung ministry formerly supplied.

Aren't there enough dead lodgepole pine to supply lumber and fibre for the next ten years?

Do you suggest donations to an environmental group?

Thanks for the post Dru, I work in Abbotsford also.
jupitermininginc is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1