Glaciers vs. snowfields - ClubTread Community

User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of (permalink) Old 01-17-2005, 07:01 PM Thread Starter
Summit Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver BC
Interest: 10%
Posts: 5,022
Default Glaciers vs. snowfields

I've been wondering what designates the difference between the two. Snowfields can be permanant, such as on the approach up to the top of Golden Ears or the one below the north face of Seymour. Is a glacier called a glacier because it is moving? And a snowfield just sits there. It stands to reason that glaciers would be bigger. Any thoughts anyone?

Simon

----------------------------------------
Opportunity knocks, temptation kicks in the door.
simonc is offline  
Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of (permalink) Old 01-17-2005, 07:11 PM
Summit Master
 
mick range's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Forest Gnome Cabin, , Canada.
Interest: Outdoor stuff...especially scrambling,trailrunning,mountain biking,kayaking,and hiking, and of course photography
Posts: 13,876
Default

Interesting topic,Simon.Two years ago I revisited permanent snowfields in the Colorado Rockies that I had first seen 25 years before.They no longer exist,basically due to climactic change.Not only are glaciers declining,but permanent snowfields are shrinking as well,including the one below Seymour.At the turn of the century,other such fields also existed on Bishop,Crown,and Cathedral,and have all but disappeared since...
mick range is offline  
post #3 of (permalink) Old 01-17-2005, 07:15 PM
Dru
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Climbing, a mountain, Canada.
Interest: climbing and spraying
Posts: 16,172
Default

glaciers have ice, and crevasses

snowfields are snow all the way down. it might be hard, frozen neve, but it isn't ice.

that's the main difference!
Dru is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of (permalink) Old 01-17-2005, 11:10 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 216
Default

I agree with dru, and too many people get the two mixed up for some reason. I hear of glaciers on a hike so I plan or look forward to them but when I get there all I see is a permanent snow pack or snow field....its a little frustrating because to me the difference is obvious, but that might be because I have a lot of experience around them and know what to look for and expect. I prefer the looks of glaciers but prefer traveling on snow packs (as long as they are flat, they are too slippery if well angled)

----------------------------------------
Why do they make 1 ply TP?
hikinguy is offline  
post #5 of (permalink) Old 01-18-2005, 08:01 PM Thread Starter
Summit Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver BC
Interest: 10%
Posts: 5,022
Default

Thankyou gentlemen. Now I know and knowing is half the battle (yeah, I watched GI Joe years ago)

----------------------------------------
Opportunity knocks, temptation kicks in the door.
simonc is offline  
post #6 of (permalink) Old 01-19-2005, 10:41 PM
Summit Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, , .
Posts: 2,674
Default

A good example of a snowfield is the east face of Mt. Sedgewick, which you can see across Howe Sound as you drive through Britannia Beach. It seems like a glacier, until sometime in the fall you realize it has completely melted.

The standard approach to Camp Muir at 10,000' on Mt. Rainier is classified as a snowfield, even though it never melts and has a few crevasses.

So maybe the defining characteristic is as Dru said, being snow right to the bottom.

----------------------------------------
Meet you at DYE-II?
sgRant is offline  
post #7 of (permalink) Old 01-20-2005, 09:35 AM
Dru
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Climbing, a mountain, Canada.
Interest: climbing and spraying
Posts: 16,172
Default

"Crevasses" in a snowfield are usually just caused by snowpack glide, or are randklufts (moats between snow and rock). However, the name snowfield is often misapplied to firn-covered parts of glaciers. To be a true glacier, though, there must be ice present. The snow on Golden Ears does totally melt away in some years, but even on years when it doesn't, no ice is present.

The residence time of a water molecule in a snowfield is on the order of 2-3 years on average while for a glacier it can range from a few years up to tens or hundreds of thousands of years.
Dru is offline  
post #8 of (permalink) Old 01-20-2005, 10:23 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,100
Default

Watch out for those holes and thin spots from the melt water running under the snow pack aswell.
kman is offline  
post #9 of (permalink) Old 01-20-2005, 12:03 PM
Off the Beaten Path
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seattle, WA, USA.
Interest: Backpacking, cycling, rock climbing, cooking, eating, snowshoeing, general hiking, easy scrambles, photography, mycology
Posts: 573
Default

Googling "Define: Glacier" returns many results from sources including univerities, (US) national parks service, NOAA, and I believe, geographic agencies. All definitions I read agree on the following as key characteristics of a glacier:

1. It is a mass of ICE
2. It "moves" or spreads outward or downslope over time.

Now I know, glaciers in most every locale are receeding, so it's not easy to see the movement. However, if you were to embed a beacon or other transmission device into the center of a glacier, over time, you would see that device move in relation to where it was originally placed. The receeding characteristic we see is glacial melt from the perimiter of the ice sheet.

One note, none of the definitions I read list the presence of glaciers as a requirement to be classified a glacier.

The cracks present on snowfields, such as Muir, are termed "Glide Cracks".

----------------------------------------
A trip is about the journey as much, if not more than about the destination. What is the joy in reaching your destination if you've ignored everything along the way?

Alex Lowe said it best: "The best climber is the one having the most fun."
marmot is offline  
post #10 of (permalink) Old 01-20-2005, 12:25 PM
Dru
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Climbing, a mountain, Canada.
Interest: climbing and spraying
Posts: 16,172
Default

sure, not all glaciers have crevasses. but all crevasses are in glaciers!
Dru is offline  
post #11 of (permalink) Old 02-06-2005, 11:46 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Dru

sure, not all glaciers have crevasses. but all crevasses are in glaciers!
Like these?



kootenaycat is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1